From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES

WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.


(Editors note:  The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012 search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama".  Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.)
By Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen 


(Updated 7/23/2012) 
KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain.  The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation. 
In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.    
The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963. 
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya.  Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly.  Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidently paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.  
Also, the presence of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington.  Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent highschool graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).      
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.


Based on procedures defined in Britain’s Births & Deaths Registration Act of 1953, The British Foreign & Commonwealth Office states the following:

“Registering A Birth

If your child is born outside the United Kingdom you can register the birth with the nearest consulate (Local British Foreign & Commonwealth Regional Registrar Office), or with our consular department in London if you’ve returned to the United Kingdom...

The standard of birth registration in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Africa and Overseas Territories is similar to the standard of birth registration of the UK.”

 

The British Registration Service Act of 1953 (UK Revised Statutes) states that the Queen appoints one Registrar General for the registration of vital records.  His or her name would appear the same on all birth certificates of children born under British common law in 1961 until the end of their service. Article 1 of the Registration Service Act of 1953 states:

 

“1 Registrar General…Her Majesty may from time to time under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom appoint a Registrar General…and any person so appointed shall exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred or imposed by or under any enactment on the Registrar General, whether described by that title alone or with any additional description, and shall hold office during Her Majesty’s pleasure.”

 

The specific sources of information pertaining to births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be researched in the following BNA files:


General Register Office
SERIES RG36
Registers and Returns of Births, Marriages and Deaths in the Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia

Legal status:    Public Record(s)
Language:    English
Creator names:    General Register Office, 1836-1970
Covering Birth Registration dates:    1895-1965
Physical description:    15 volume(s)
Access conditions:    Available in microform only
Held by:    The National Archives, Kew
Scope and content:    Notifications forwarded by officials responsible for civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, Kenya, Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates.
Publication note:    Geoffrey Yeo 'The British Overseas, A Guide to Records of Their Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in the United Kingdom', London, 2nd edn, 1988.
Related material:    Some earlier returns from the East African territories in the period during which they were under Foreign Office control are in the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar general.
Place:    Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 - 1963
  
Subjects:    Birth: registration
Courtesy: British National Archives 


Recall, on August 1, 2009, Dr. Alan Keyes, Pamela Barnett and 42 other plaintiffs filed evidence in a lawsuit challenging Obama eligibility which included a copy of an image of an alleged Kenyan Copy of Certification of Registration of Birth (CCRB).  In the hours after the image appeared on the internet, MSNBC and other liberal mainstream, pro-Obama networks went ballistic attempting to debunk the idea that such a document exists. 

The liberal media went out of its way to discredit the image, protesting too much, going as far as to claim that the Kenyan CCRB image was forged based on an Australian birth certificate which was miraculously discovered by an unnamed blogger for a man named Bomford.

On August 2, Keith Olbermann led the deranged effort on his now defunct "Countdown" show to lie and propagandize the CCRB using insults and baseless criticism of unknown "birthers" who he claimed "attempted and failed to pass off a forgery." 

Strangely, however, no one in the mainstream liberal media would address the question now answered by the recent discovery at the BNA.  The Bomford document and the Kenyan CCRB would indeed appear the same under British birth registration processes and documentation formats because both municipalities in Kenya and Australia, in 1961, operated under the Registrar General of the British government.

It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that "birthers" had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama.  This was done by Obama's forgers to create "shell game" confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama's forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand. 

Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama's foreign birth records.     

The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA.  The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961.  Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya  and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.    
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).  
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender.  However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives.  According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books.  Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958. 
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.    
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009.  African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa. 
OBAMA’S FATHER FAILED TO INCLUDE BIRTH OF “SON” ON INS APPLICATION
For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya.  However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy. 
On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name is newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S. 
Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension.  The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.      
Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011.  The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.
THE UGLY TRUTH
However, the sad and pathetic truth about Obama’s covert natal history and his illegitimacy lies at the bottom of a sordid pit of lies surrounding the paternity of his birth.  Doubts about his identity, his eligibility, his intentions, his honesty and his honorability as a man stem from what appears to be an ugly truth about his mother’s probable sexual involvement with multiple men associated with the radical socialist movement in 1960’s Hawaii.
Obama and his horde of abettors defend an improbable narrative about his identity.  The veracity of this narrative has been damaged under the weight of a steady stream of crushing evidence demonstrating more than 180 disparities and contradictions to Obama’s claims of natal legitimacy as president. 
If Obama’s cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father’s culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is.  Vintage America is on to him.  Their instincts are slowly turning Obama’s fantasy of a socialist utopia for those he believes are humanity’s offended into a laughingstock.  By building his vision for America on clay feet of lies about his who he is, he has undermined any intention of doing something good and right.  He is not to be trusted. 
Moreover, Obama is learning the painful lesson that a message of “Hope and Change” means something vastly different to vintage America, the most powerful and affluent culture in human history, when that message has been proven to come from someone as audaciously dishonest and deceptively calculating as this son of otherness.            
Recall, in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child. 
In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571.  In some cases, the biological father may not even know he is the father if the mother has had more than one sexual partner prior to the pregnancy.  There was no DNA test in 1961, however the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report shows there were more than 1000 such “illegitimate” births reported in the state of Hawaii during that year, about 1 in 17.   
Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father.  This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery.   Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law. 
However, notations indicating that a certificate contains updated paternal information would be typed or printed in the lower margin of the new certificate, below the signature section.  This lower margin of the image of Obama’s certificate has been shown by computer experts to be concealed by forgers using a “clipping mask”.  A clipping mask is a feature available in Adobe software which limits the viewable area on a document image through which only selected information can be seen.  In the case of Obama’s forged certificate, the information we have been allowed to see within the frame of the clipping mask may merely reflect an amended birth record while concealing notations of the amendments which exists in the lower margin outside the frame of the clipping mask. 
Regardless of any level of truth about any individual piece of information in the image, overall, the final image is the product of criminals and liars.   
If Obama is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility.  Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history.  Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause. 
Cowardly judges refuse to allow any exposure Obama’s actual natural born identity and, in their dereliction, have conjured a legal fantasy filled with pressurizing wrath in which a candidate’s eligibility for president is not only declared legally uncontestable but is also automatically preeminent.  In allowing this, judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation with the help of the American media and a complicit legal system.        
THE MARRIAGE SHAM
On his application, when asked the name and address of his spouse, it appears Obama may have first written the name of his actual wife in Kenya before blacking it out and writing “Ann S. Dunham”. 
Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S.  There is no evidence or testimony that Obama ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged.  The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii. 
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964.  However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child.  A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.
THE INS’ PERSPECTIVE    
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S.   However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham.  This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.    
From the perspective of an INS agent, the circumstances surrounding Obama’s relationship with Dunham would have raised suspicions.  Immigration fraud was rampant during Hawaii’s foreign birth accommodation era in the 1960’s. 
Since Obama was a foreigner wanting to extend his temporary visa, the INS certainly understood that by claiming a marriage to Dunham, it would promote INS approval of an extension, but in Dunham’s case there was an added risk to the relationship for Obama…she was pregnant. 
It appears, from the contents of documents in Obama’s INS file, when pressed by INS agents and school officials on the actual validity of his relationship to Dunham and baby Obama, having certainly been advised of legal ramifications for lying, he refused to name Obama as his child but maintained that he was married to Dunham.  This indicates that Obama was either not certain if he was the biological father, or that he knew he wasn’t.      
Under child protection laws in many states, including Hawaii, when the biological father is deceased or unidentified by the mother, the man who is married to the mother at the time she gives birth automatically becomes the father named on the official birth certificate until it is proven in court that he is not the biological father.  “Mandatory Legitimacy” applies even if the birth is the result of adultery, when the mother is married at the time of birth, until paternity is successfully contested.  Today, DNA testing allows for conclusive determinations about paternity, but in 1961, it was more difficult to determine paternity.  Hawaii’s child welfare statutes indicate the “statutory” father’s name on the certificate may be removed by court order, if paternity is successfully contested, after a judge has decided the case in the interest of the child’s welfare.  This law is intended to protect the child if the mother dies.
DELUSIONS OF LEGITIMACY
Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility.  The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama.  Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin.  Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.      
Ignorance, lies and lack of understanding about the difference between a medically verified birth and a legal registration of birth has confused the public about Obama’s natal history and eligibility. 
Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.   
The elder Obama’s name appears as the father of a newborn son in images of two birth announcements appearing in two Honolulu newspapers on August 13th and 14th, 1961.  Birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 were published automatically from a birth registration list provided directly to the papers by the Hawaiian Department of Health.  The notifications of births provided to the Health Department, however, were not only the product of information provided by hospitals and doctors, alone.
The distinction between the information used by the hospital to create a “Certificate of Live Birth” and the information used by the Department of Health to create a birth registration is that information used to create birth registrations were allowed to be submitted from anyone possessing credible information about the birth, including family members, witnesses or attendants, regardless of the actual location of the birth.  Contrarily, the information on a “Live Birth” record must be verified and attested by a licensed medical doctor qualified to determine the characteristics of a live birth event.  This is important in cases when a distinction was needed between a “still birth” and a baby that may have been born alive but then died upon delivery.  In the latter case, both a birth certificate and a death certificate are required while a still birth requires only a death certificate because of the definition of a live birth under HRS 338-1.   
Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures.  Unfortunately, these vital statistics reporting guidelines are not conducive with determining the natural born status of the child. 
For example, the Bureau of Census in 1961 counted all residents by county regardless of their temporary absence at the time of the Census when the Census worker was able to identify residents of a county through the information provided by others.  This applies even today. 
Therefore, beginning in as early as 1933, it was determined that births must be accounted the same way for all usual residents regardless of the mother’s location at the time of the event when that resident mother intended to return to that county.  In Hawaii, if a child did not have an official certificate prior to the mother’s return, the local Health Department was obligated to provide one under the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942, Section 8 of Hawaii’s Public Health Regulations and HRS 338.    
The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961.  The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S.  Vital statistics are reported annually, but the Census only occurs every ten years which means there is large volume of population which goes untracked between Census years.  If births and deaths were not allocated to the residents of each county, regardless of the location of the vital event, the results would cause large disparities when compared with the Census data.          

159 comments:

  1. At that time, the British National Archives was located at St. Catherines House in London. I learned that while doing the genealogy for some Manx ancestors. Isle of Man was also a British Protectorate so all of the birth, death and Christening records were filed in London. And even as a back up to that, the Mormon church (Latter Day Saints) microfilmed most of the records in London so references to those births should be found on index reels from which to order copies of the actual microfilmed document. Sheriff Arpaio has asked for microfilm from Hawaii, but nowhere else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If any of this is true, then why is he and the father referred to as Obama? That was not their name...the prez original name was Barry Soetoro...
      Just sayin'

      Delete
    2. Soetoro was the last name of Stanley Ann Durham's second husband in Indonesia, who supposedly adopted Barack Hussein Obama II, thus giving him the additional last name of Soetoro.

      Delete
  2. Unbelievabe. The largest cover up in the history of the United States

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No it is NOT the largest cover up in US history, but it is BIG.

      Delete
    2. Then, WHAT may I ask is the "Largest Coverup in US history"?

      Delete
    3. The largest coverup in US history is either for Michelle's butt or Christie's gut.....

      Delete
    4. aliens, working with the americain governement since 1947? working toward a NWO and total Soul enslavement of humanity throught a cybernetic quantum matrix.. AKA: the movie matrix.


      Some say JFK got killed because he wanted to go on the moon. And well the darpa areonautics divison said no, well we told a big no no. by their alien overlord.

      so the alien sat together and dreamed the whole scene, all those shooters pilgrimaged to go shoot JFK.

      Delete
    5. JFK got killed because he was going to do away with the Federal Reserve. The government killed JFK.

      Delete
  3. I have a question for my readers. If the ineligibility movement was not scoring significant victories why would the Democratic Party and Obama’s supporters be trying so hard to silence the issue? Why not encourage the legal establishment to rule on the evidence and the law, rather than avoiding the facts? Why not encourage the Supreme Court to rule, rather than evade? Why not encourage a public open discussion of the ineligibility issue? Why not have public debates on national television? Why not release the many documents that reveal Obama’s history? Why not give millions of citizens the information they want? Or, why not simply ignore it? Why indeed? I know why. The “birthers” are winning and Obama can’t afford to give them any more ammunition!
    Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning
    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/evidence-obama-ineligibility-movement.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exposing Obama’s PSYOPS Agents and Tactics
      http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/exposing-obamas-psyops-agents-and.html

      Delete
    2. I don't think the eligibility should ever be an election issue. That's always something that should be taken care of before the candidate is allowed to run. In other words, the buck stopped at Nancy Pelosi. And since 2010 the buck stops at John Boehner. That said, I do believe that Obama wishes the birth certificate become the election issue. That's likely why they call on Romney to release his records. That's why Obama posted at least one photo shopped photo on his Facebook.

      Delete
    3. I alway7s said 0bama is a Bastard,,,

      Delete
    4. If Obama's real birth certificate (or a verified certified copy of) were to find it's way to a Congressional Fact Finding Hearing, the fallout would be an attempt to impeach him immediately. Congress may be able to declare all the legislation he signed null and void. It may take a SCOTUS decision to uphold that kind of action but hey, I'm thinking a best case scenario.

      Trump said he'd finance the investigation, maybe he should organize a sheriff from AZ to go to the UK, provide some legal request to obtain certified copies of the document. After all, exposing the illegal sealing of the document by a foreign national representative should not carry weight against a legal request from a law agency of Texas, Arizona, etc.

      Publicity of US Attorney Generals and Sheriffs from various states actively seeking that document would help, too. I wouldn't hold my breath for it to actually happen, Brits can be awfully stubborn.

      Delete
    5. I was suspicious when Obama refused to show his Birth Certificate. When he came up with a Certificate of Live Birth I was really suspicious. The reason was because my daughter got that when she was born on a Navy base in Japan. I had to write Washington to get a Birth Certificate. I told people that and was ignored. I even had one liberal said that we conservatives were getting clever. I don't care if your liberal or conservative is you don't qualify you don't get to be president. Now the Supreme Court wants to revisit what a natural born citizen is and that is to save Obama. The courts already did that and guess what they also used the word US parents not parent!!!!

      Delete
    6. Don't expect any action from congress. Nearly every member of congress is guilty of criminal activity.

      Boehner has told all members not to discuss Obama's eligibility at all, not even in private meetings or there will be a huge price to pay. This issue could open up massive criminal activity in congress including the coverup of 9/11 and Oklahoma City.

      Members of congress and the major media have been threatened with death, including their families if they speak out.

      Delete
    7. Richard, How do you know that members of congress have had their lives threatened? Can you give me some documentation? What are your references? I would like to pursue this line further but need some factual data. Threats of this nature are quite serious and our laws demand that they be investigated which we are doing. Thanks for your help.
      John Burge PhD
      JWBurge & Assoc.

      Delete
    8. As long as this stuff continues about obama being a citizen or not we will never get him defeated on Nov. 6th. What good will it do now? We need to get his opponent elected and him & his socialistic friends out of the White House now before he does anymore damage and the liberals will fight tooth and nail against this theory.

      Delete
    9. this is reply to CafeNetAmerica
      So you want to vote against the constitution? Isn't the constitution the supreme law of this land?
      I for one will not vote against the constitution, nor try to change its wording.. Yes the scheme contained at least two perpetrators.. One B.Clinton who nominated him and one Pelosi who did not check him out.. also a third Obama himself when he swore to uphold and defend the constitution upon attaining office

      Delete
    10. The Mormans do keep a very accurate account of births and deaths and after what was done to their morman friend Romney during the election, don't you think they would have exposed Obama by now if they had anything about Obummers birth?

      Delete
  4. Well can someone please go to Salt Lake City and look up whether the records are there? PLEASE. you could open a Paypal account for donations for airfare.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone I know already went to Salt Lake City and there you will find the Brits Royal Family ree, and on it is BARACk HUSSEIN OBAMA...any questions?

      Delete
    2. TYPO CORRECTION ABOVE: FAMILY TREE

      Delete
    3. Ummm, yes. If that is true and they found this documentation, would you please share it with the world?

      Delete
    4. if this has been found and it is the real and true document===it would save the world if it were made public==why has this person not brought it to the attention of those of us that have so diligently been scratching and hoping to find something----I'll bet for one that Sheriff Arpaio would scream for joy to get his hands on something like this-----PLEASE DO SOMETHING WITH IT THAT WOULD BENEFIT THE WORLD!!!!!!!

      Delete
  5. America has become a nation of fools, and it is being led by a fool in chief.. Obama, a fool and a fraud...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama is no fool, he is a very crafty liar and fraud

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. Thank you. We are not the ones ELUDING these records, are we? :)

      Delete
  7. Yes, the plot thickens... As to these Micro Film documents, one would have to consider that these rocks had already been turned by those who wish to and continue to keep his factual record hidden. Is there a crack in their work to cover-up? I can only hope, otherwise, this crisis will never be resolved. God knows there isn't a Judge in our land who wants the blood of civil unrest on his/her hands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. America no longer has men of honor leading the land.....we have cowards, profligates and traitors to the Constitution.
      I continue to watch for the George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and freedom fighters of our time to stand and deliver.

      Delete
    2. Yes, P. You did read that Hillbillary went to London in Aug,2009 and made a surprise visit to the hall of records and now no one can access them, right?

      Delete
  8. Keep up the good work. CDR Kerchner (Ret), ProtectOurLiberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  9. HAWAII NEVER ISSUED BIRTH CERT ONLY CERT OF LIVE BIRTH WHICH IS NOT THE SAME---FBI WARNS -DO NOT ACCEPT A CERT OF LIVE BIRTH FOR A REAL BIRTH CERT WHICH HAS THE HOSP-DOCTOR-FOOT PRINTS OF THE BABY.---HAWAII MAY HAVE LET IN MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS INTO USA---TREASONOUS--CONGRESS INVESTIGATE--

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In Hawaii, they will not accept a birth cert that does not have the special ink and seal of the issuing State. Just to get a permit to drive you must show: Birth Cert (with special ink and Seal), Social Security Card, DD214, and current utility bill showing proof of residences. ALL MUST HAVE THE SAME NAMES AND SPELLING OF THE NAMES. AND I have to take that information every two years when I get a new permit. Also needed for welfare I'm told by my neighbor. That's more than you need for a passport!

      Delete
    2. Obama's first drivers lic was issued in New York. Under the name Barry Shabazz

      Delete
  10. There are 2 prophecies they do not want you to know about-one from Kenya-that states a Kenyan will be leader of the USA and destroy it-the other by psychic Jean Dixon that declares what he will look like-Obama looks just like a certain Egyptian Pharaoh. There is a photo of Obama next to it-they are twins-in her prophecy he speaks about a child born during the FEB 5, 1962 a certain astrological event, and OBAMA may have changed his birth date to hide the fact, to AUG 4, 1961, perhaps the birth of one of his many half brothers. The Dixon Prophecy says people will see him as a savior/missiah-man of peace-but he is the evil antichrist. that will destroy the world. the “Son of Kenya” foretold by the great 19th
    Century Kenyan Prophet, Johanwa Owalo, the founder of Kenya’s Nomiya Luo Church?
    Among the Kenyan people of the Luo religion Owalo is believed to be a prophet similar to Jesus Christ and Muhammad, and who in 1912 made this horrific prophecy about the United States: “
    Another prophecy states-there will be no presidents after the 43rd-this may be true because Obama is actually the first dictator of the soon to be new american Union-to take effect after Martial law, before the next elections which will never be held.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeane Dixon? Good grief, this is a serious blog.

      Delete
    2. HA! Yeah, Jenchen really uncovered the truth there. We should all pay heed.

      Delete
    3. Well Ms Dixon also predicted that the island of Okinawa would have a severe earthquake in 1974 and sink into the Pacific Ocean. My family and I left Okinawa in 1975 and the island is still intact, but not before scaring thousands of military and military dependents (who knew the island is only held up by three large coral pillars) who read her column in the only English newspaper there, the military's Stars and Stripes. She can go to hello for all I care!

      Delete
    4. scoff all you want but many MANY of her phophesies have come true--I WILL NOT LAUGH AT ANYTHING SHE SAYS==how are we to know what is real and not real?? the great Edgar Casey should show many how a human can be gifted with these phophetic capabilities--if you disbelieve his work just do some reading on them---DO NOT RIDICULE UNTIL YOU HAVE READ OF SOME OF THE THINGS HE SAID THAT CAME TRUE RIGHT DOWN TO THE LETTER----OBAMA SCARES ME AND WE WOULD ALL DO WELL TO FEAR HIS ACTS AS ILLEGAL SITTING POS-----I ONLY PRAY I AM WRONG ABOUT THE MANY THINGS I THINK COULD HAPPEN BEFORE HIS TERM IS OVER-----

      Delete
  11. Why would Hillary cover for him?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They serve the same master, the Rothschild bank.

      Delete
    2. You got that right and they also own the media, which is why eligibility is ignored...

      Delete
    3. It's the old J. Edgar Hoover move: if your political enemies are about to expose you, turn around and blackmail them with something bad in their past. And God knows the Clintons have plenty of stuff in their past to provide someone ammunition for extortion.

      Delete
    4. Hillary would cover for him because she is CIA too. Actually she is former CIA, but former is no different than current. See http://owg.livejournal.com/2012/05/10/ and http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj35/35.html for info on Obama's affiliation with the CIA.

      Delete
    5. Why would Hillary do this? Remember, when she failed to win the Presidential bid, in a CLOSED ROOM MEETING with Obama ... things were discussed ... promises were made ... and she miraculously was offered her Secretary of State position. Hmmmmm. Could her covering for Obama be part of that bargain?

      This is all much deeper than any of us realize. Books are literally FILLED with reasons why Mr. Obama should be JAILED and charged with Treason and Sedition ... yet nothing happens. Why you wonder? Don't we ALL!!

      Delete
    6. Hillary and Bill both are being blackmailed, by threats to uncover their hellish past

      Delete
  12. Truth will prevail. Light cleaveth unto light.

    ReplyDelete
  13. She was in Topeka,Ks after birth in 8.61 where I saw her. Last seen in 1/61 when enrolled at Topeka HS ubder birth name of father who was born as Daniel Wayne Pope. Has anyone checked records in Topeka? Next tme saw Obama was 1/71 with his grandmother in Washington stste. Linda Joy Adams,3rd cousun

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you say "she" are you talking about Stanley Ann Dunham? Are you saying her father was born Daniel Pope and not Dunham?

      Delete
    2. Since the article is about Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, I think it is safe to say that "She" refers to Stanley Ann Dunham.

      Likely the only truth that Barack Hussein Obama ever uttered is that his father is an American since in reading this article, it seems clear that Barack Hussein Obama of Kenya is not Barack Hussein Obama's father, the man who is currently residing in the White House because if the senior Obama was the current occupant of the White House's father, he would have so indicated that on his application to come to the United States.

      Barack Hussein Obama, who is currently in the White House, was born in Kenya, so that in and of itself makes him ineligible to be the president of the United States. But even if he is eligible to be president of the United States, he has committed treason with his signing of the NDAA on December 31, 2011, so he should be impeached for that anyway.

      This whole thing stinks to high heaven anyway since Stanley Ann Dunham had sex outside of marriage, and then lied about it claiming to have been married to a man who was legally married to someone else who was born outside of the United States.

      Delete
    3. yes, Stanley Ann Dunham was really Stanley Ann Pope, her dad, Daniel Wayne Pope changed his idenity so he could get into war before he was old enough to.
      Barrack H. Obama was born at the Forbes Air Force Hospital in Topeka KS, the hospital is not open anymore and I don't know where all the hospital records are. Stanley was able to have Barrack there since her dad was in the military. Obama senior is NOT the father of the president, the real father was drowned in the KAW River I was told, but in the 1960's black + white relationships were not accepted well and so I understand that some racial group pushed him in the river. You know what the craziest thing about all of this is that I cannot find any newspaper articles from Topeka to support this. I keep looking for it.

      Delete
  14. Are there any pics of the index data to back up this claim?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hillary covered for him because undoubtedly there is dirt on her....Chicago thug politics in play here big.time.

    ReplyDelete
  16. i'm sick to my stomach over all of this,,My heart is Broken for MY country,,How the Hell could this Happen,,Maybe God gave us this LIar ,thug, fraud,whatever, he is exactly what we deserved,,,Just My opinion,,America is falling folks ,,Fast,,Pray for her,she needs them an ALOT of them,,!,

    ReplyDelete
  17. The silence concerning the elimination of the natural born eligibility requirement is deafening. There is a bi-partisan coup that is ongoing and you will not no it, if you watch TV or read the NYT.

    See http://wp.me/p2i3SD-6 which analyzes the serial hypocrisy of the GOP regarding this issue. You likely notice how quiet they are. The reasons are: George Romney, Sen Rubio, Gov. Jindal, and even Sen McCain. None of these people are natural born. So, while being angry at the "President" be sure to vote out anyone who says natural born is the same as native born.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even though I can't stand John McCain, and did not vote for him, at least his parents are both American born. It's my understanding that that made John McCain eligible to be president. But the powers-that-be want to control the United States, so what they want goes, and it doesn't matter what party the candidate belongs to, because the powers-that-be control them all. For proof of the two major parties, please read http://www.truedemocracy.net/w01/3.html You'll learn a piece of history too, that people in Canada, all of western Europe, and Argentina know from their mainstream press too.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  18. Try posting this link to Yahoo comments. They censor it immediately

    ReplyDelete
  19. try sticking your head between your legs and stretch it far back enough to get a good look at your anus...

    can you see your birth records there?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Pen Johannson, Is that you Lord Monkton? Do I get a Daily Pen jacket and tie if I'm right? Whoever you are - please call in on Jeff Crouere's 'Ringside Politics with a Punch' AM 990 New Orleans, M-F 7-11, (504) 251-3110 and convey the above explicated information if you please. Also, if you can find the time, please read the only two editorials I've ever had published; both on thepostemail.com: 'Independence From Islam' Dec. 6, 2011 and 'Is There a More Serious Crime Than the Usurpation of the Presidency?' Nov. 29,2011. VICTORI TE SALUTAMUS, chris farrell

    ReplyDelete
  21. If the allegations are true, yes, ALL politicians are the same. Raise your hand if you know of any politician that doesn't lie or cover up.... and we end up having to choose the least worst...With that being said I'd rather have Obama as president than BUSH!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama is related to Bush. Lynne Cheney stated that on a YouTube before the 2008 election. Even Obama admitted on a YouTube that he is related to Dick Cheney before the 2008 election. And Dick Cheney is related to Bush.

      Delete
    2. Actually, I do know an honest politician. His name is Senator Mike Johanns, (R)NE. He has also served as Secretary of Agriculture under GWB, and was Governor of Nebraska for a while. Calm, steady, trustworthy, he would be a great President or Vice President, but he doesn't seem to have the flashy personality that people vote for. It's a shame.

      Delete
    3. And I cannot vote against the constitution!!

      Delete
    4. It would seem that if Obama is related to Dick Cheney and George Bush that 1) we could discover how they are related and 2) they should be able to shed light on the birth issues. I think Dick is from Topeka KS also...I am going to check on this.

      Delete
  22. Had Barack Hussein Obama robbed a bank or raped someone or even murdered somebody, these would have been LESSER crimes than the crime he has knowingly and willingly committed. He isn't a victim, he is a criminal along with Nancy Pelosi and all those others holding high government offices who helped perpetrate this treasonous act. The damage Obama has done to not only the 300 million plus Americans who "elected" him under false pretenses but the entire world can not be undone. Consider the choices he has made, the executive orders he has issued and the general lack of regard for the people who trusted him and you should come to the conclusion that he must be removed from office immediately and tried for treason. There is no other choice. Had he committed the much lesser crimes mentioned above, he could still legally serve out his term of office. However, considering the magnitude of this crime...the biggest fraud in U.S. history...and the damage he's already done, he must go immediately and all...ALL...those who helped him must be placed on trial as co-conspirators.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Obama administration knew about the Libya attack the moment it started.. and did nothing to protect.
      What kind of a crime against the USA is this??

      Delete
  23. Oh dear, another appeal to an anonymous authority and sealed records. Are you serious?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just laugh when I see you Democrats posting you're little messages. You say absolutely nothing, because you have nothing. Very similar to saying "Na, Na, Na, Na Na!!".

      Delete
    2. Republican .....Democrat.... No matter. That is one more label that can help divide our people. If all of us could sit at a table together and not see these divisions our voices would be heard. In stead we call each other names and allow ourselves to be played and controlled by these people we call our government. I AM AN AMERICAN.... that's it. I am not green, orange, or any other color. I am not a hyphenated American (Mexican,African,Italian-Americana..... what ever). These are more divisions. Then we have Yankee or Southerner. Rich and poor. If we as a people could pull our heads out of you know where, we all would see the real problem is Washington. Instead, we allow them to divide and conquer. People that will not stand together will fall together, like it or not!!!!

      Delete
    3. After reading all this 'stuff', I thank JQ for actually posting the bottom line truth. I do have several questions though. Is the problem Washington itself? Is it the physical location from the rest of the country? Is it all the money changers in Washington? Who or what in DC?

      Delete
  24. These documents supercede anything I've seen thus far. Who can deny this? It should be plastered on billboards, sent to Sheriff Arpaio, Donald Trump, Attorney Gary Kreep (who has filed lawsuits), Dinesh S'ouza, author of "Roots of Obama's Rage" and the movie just released in July: '2016: Obama's America' - http://tppatriots.com/2012/07/12/obamas-america-2016-movie-trailer/ -- (sign up for e-mail updates for showings) send to Congressmen and Senators, talk show radio hosts, media (good luck!), Romney's campaign (vetting), Ron Paul, and to our fellow Americans who believe in truth and justice. We the People have the right to protect our country -- we're not a third world country (yet)...but if this keeps up, we will have changed our country with no option to return. God help us!

    ReplyDelete
  25. I love the the Liberians reply on here about this subject. Noneaewilling to face the fact that HILLARY CLINTON is the person who provided all the evidence against OBOMBA they loss the argument when they are left with nothing else but to attack the person. 1 st. Rule of debating, if you can't refute the facts with facts that prove the other person wrong, attack the persons credit ability when that's all they have left THEY LOSE the argument. Why are they so scared to present the facts to the american public.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You do know that Liberians are people from Liberia, don't you?

      Delete
  26. I give this two minutes before this is debunked

    ReplyDelete
  27. Even if it is true, the probability that anyone will do anything about it is near zero.

    ReplyDelete
  28. It is too late now to stop Barack Hussein Obama. With legislation set in place, marshall law ready to go into effect at Obama's nod, a cadre of Muslim Brotherhood loyalists ready to take place as Obama's personal guards and top military leaders pledged to Obama's cause, we have little hope of forcing him out of office should he lose the election.

    Face it citizens of our beloved America, we will soon be a socialistic state and members of Congress with those already leaning toward socialism, Pelosi, Reid, etc., those we have elected into office will turn their backs on their constituients to save their own hides.

    It's a grim picture none of us want to believe this could happen to the United States of America, but voters complacency has led us down this road and we are too weak willed to fight back.

    ReplyDelete
  29. That Obama is what we used to call back in Alabama, a "c-o-o-n." This was not meant as a pejorative, but meant a black man, or at least half black, who acted as though he was a white man. Such behaviour was not acceptable then, and it's not acceptable now.
    Obama is a communist also, and rumours have it that he engaged in homosexual orgies with psychedelic drugs when he was in high school and college. His marriage is a sham, a social convenience to make him look "normal." But we know he is anything but that! Also, when he was in law school, there were stories that he had somehow been teletransported to another planet, and was conspiring with aliens to eventually take over planet earth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please tell em you're joking? Oh god, you're not, are you?

      Why does this even matter? If Obamba turns out not to be of American birth, why would this effect his capabilities of running a country. He's doing a better job of it than the previous president.

      Rather than just spewing all this 'evidence' and such, why not use your common sense? If eh were a 'communist' (Which isn't exactly a bad system, the people who run it just get corrupt and such), why would he be running a democratic country?

      Oh, and why would 'Gay Orgies' (If they did take place, which is highly doubtful) did take place; so what? Again, would it really change the way he runs a country? If anything, I look up to this man. He's managed to push past all your blabbering idiots, and become a true figure of the 21st century.

      Oh, and just for the record; Aliens? Really?

      Delete
    2. We are a republic not a democracy. No communist country has EVER failed to be corrupt and no communist country has ever risen in economic power relative to its size. Obama is not a natural born US citizen and according to our Constitution he is not a legitimate President. I guess you did not notice the 5.1 trillion he has spent with nothing to show for it. Completely brain washed uninformed citizens such as yourself are truly pathetic to see.

      Delete
    3. Bad news for you; im not a US citizen.

      I wouldn't call it brain washed. If so, then I may as well call you 'Brainwashed' Again, you have failed to answer my question; '...so what? Again, would it really change the way he runs a country?'

      To be fair on him, he had to pick up where a idiotic man has left off. What would you have done, in his situation? Im afraid its not as simple as 'Im going to take money off of the rich now!'.

      Delete
    4. No worries, we can tell from your love of communism and the 96 million people it's killed that you are not a US citizen.

      Delete
    5. As I said' the results of it corruption.
      Do you really want me to tell you about Healthcare in the US?
      'Whats that? Your poor? You need life saving treatment?' Bah, go fuck yourself.'

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  30. POLL: Only 9% Believe Obama Has Documented His Eligibility
    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/poll-only-9-believe-obama-has.html

    Many of the national opinion polls show that a large segment of the citizens still have questions about Obama’s questionable history, and they still want answers! In a July 2012 poll 45% of the general public and 69% of Republicans have doubts about Obama’s birthplace. Many voters have been influenced away from voting for Obama because of the obvious cover up of Obama’s past. Just type these search words into Google and see for yourself: obama eligible poll. The ineligibility movement has educated the voters beyond the circumstances of Obama’s birth and the citizenship of his father. Now people are aware that Obama’s history of education, medical history, travel and passport history, the history of his parent’s marriage and divorce, adoption records, the records of the Illinois bar, Illinois State Senate records, his beliefs, past associates, personal behavior and many other mysteries still remain unresolved. The uncertainty created by Obama’s cover up will significantly affect voting outcome. Most presidential elections are decided by a very narrow margin. Given that about half the American people are uncertain about Obama’s history, the 2012 vote will be more influenced by the ineligibility movement than any demographic group. That is a victory of the “think for themselves” citizens over the ambiguous cover ups offered by the ruling elite! Yet another clear victory for the birthers!

    Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning
    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/evidence-obama-ineligibility-movement.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Once again, back to spewing out 'evidence'. Common sense, if you please.

      Delete
    2. Thank you Sam. I would like to include his fraudulent Conn. SS number. There is the murder of two of his gay lovers in Chicago. His Chicago mansion was purchased without paying the correct taxes at a below market price. The empty lot next door was purchased from the same owner at an inflated price by a Chicago mobster and then he did nothing with it. A law firm where he worked and the mobster were both paid large sums of federal housing money after he became Senator.

      Delete
  31. Apparently the author of this piece, Dan Crosby, hasn't yet heard the news!! The "Elder Barack Obama" is NOT the person posing as Barack Obama's (in the White House) father. Frank Marshall Davis is the father of the man currently holding office of POTUS, "Barack Obama". The "Barack Obama" in the White House is a FRAUD! www.ObamasRealFather.com

    ReplyDelete
  32. Obama groomed from birth by the CIA.

    ReplyDelete
  33. So Hillary "Mz. Bill" Clinton, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, visited London, England, and induced the British government to withhold its documentary, archival evidence that Obama is a criminal fraud from public scrutiny. That makes Hillary "Mz. Bill" Clinton a co-conspirator, aiding and abetting a set of circumstances that have the malicious intent to place, and to keep in place, a foreigner in the office of President of the United States. The word for that ultimately disloyal act is treason. HillyBilly knows this, as do Reid and Pelosi, and the lying, complicit subversives in the Hawaiian government. That is why they are so desperate to bury the truth of The Kenyan's real identity. They will not succeed. I look forward to the day when everyone associated with this outrage, including the disgraced judges, is sent to jail for life.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  35. What is always curious to me is why so many people fixate on the literal piece of paper or its PDF format. Millions of birth certificates are lost by parents through the course of a child's life. An "original" is not required to prove citizenship, merely a certified version.

    A State cannot "forge" its own documents, and "certification" is actually an abstract concept, not a concrete one. In other words, the State of Hawaii could "certify" a piece of toilet paper by an act of the Legislature, or by a signed statement from the governor, and it would *be* certified simply because the State of Hawaii says so.

    It should be noted that this is also in accordance with the US Constitution, which allows each State to decide how it will keep and certify its own records. So unless the State of Hawaii decides to RETRACT its certification of Obama's birth (snowball's chance in hell), you are all simply showing your ignorance.

    You also may want to consider how the definition of "natural born" is the definition under international law, not US law. US law does not define it explicitly, and relies on precedent case law instead. The international law definition of "natural born" is actually a good definition, I myself like it, but it is not our current law. There's an exhaustive article about this, including all the case law history and challenges undergone by former presidential candidates who ran into this issue. It would be a good place to start.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause

    But it's perplexing how y'all can be such dupes, to fall for the RUSE of people whose agenda is actually to make international law govern over US law. Can't you tell Orly Taitz is a Zionist, from a socialist country, with ties to Mossad? Why would you believe a Zionist/socialist over the Legislature of a state in your own nation?

    If, however, you like the international law definition, as I do, work to get it legislated. But don't show how ignorant you are by pretending that it is already our law when it's not.

    As far as records from the Kenyan protectorate, honestly, don't make me laugh. Kenya is, and always has been, rife with counterfeiters. To say that you trust a dubious piece of paper in a foreign location OVER the certification of a State of the United States, kinda shows that you might be Zionist/socialists yourself, not really pro-US, and maybe are actually just trying to promote that internationalist agenda, eh?

    Get straight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does This Document Make Me ELIGIBLE to be POTUS?

      http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/08/does-this-document-make-me-eligible-to.html

      Delete
    2. The doc presented by Obama has been tampered with and you can see the layers in Photoshop. It's that simple. I personally think no birth certificate exists. Dunham's parents wanted to adopt a foreign born child and I think Obama was it and Dunham posed as the parent along with the kenyan student posing as the father. Obama has dopple gangers throughout Indonesia. http://o-mi-g.blogspot.com/2010/11/obamas-lookalike.html I believe he is an Indonesia orphan adopted specifically to be indoctrinated in social marxism and hatred of America and to run for prez when he grew up. His schooling has been controlled by his supposed grandparents and paid entirely by social marxists and communist heavy hitters. His entrance into politics was in the most corruptable arena of Chicago where positions are routinely arranged. His background was fabricated by Ayers. From little up he was told and told others he would be prez. This guy was manufactured. His first job was at CIA front BIC Corp.

      Delete
  36. Nice Article! Thanks for sharing with us.
    Grooming Products

    ReplyDelete
  37. Are those British shredders I'm hearing?

    ReplyDelete
  38. The law is for those that break it not those that follow it. Let us assume that this was four years of an oddity in a new nation - 300 years to 180 years depending on how you want to look at it. Reason will always win and once you know what not crossing the street is, how does the problem ever get away again? If you have to talk to a problem, you do not get a chance to hear the difference. There is the inferior there is the superior. We are in a fashionable error and greater minds will prevail. The system is new to checks and balances that once were done manually. We never suspected an inside bad deal. It is not going win in the long run. Witness protection got out of hand.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Investigate, arrest, trial, conviction, imprisonment. Same as any other criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Obama and Hillary should be removed from office on fraud.and once removed they should be tried in court

    ReplyDelete
  42. As your Senators and Congressman to respond to thisl.. they won't

    ReplyDelete
  43. The depth and breadth of corruption in our federal government is unprecedented. It is well established in BOTH Parties and the crimes being committed daily have been ongoing for DECADES. A concerted effort to destroy this nation has been ongoing since it's inception and it has made a great deal of headway, mostly through subversive means, through manipulation and infiltration of the federal government.

    The idea that we truly have a say in choosing our elected leaders, through the voting process is a complete farce at the federal level and there is vast manipulation at the lower levels as well, most of it funded by the same factions that have infiltrated our nations capital.

    They are in complete control of the DNC and largely of the GOP. Manipulation of the 2008 primaries by the DNC includes multiple murders (see Bettina Viviano's expose on the 2008 election ) and threats to murder Chelsea Clinton, if Bill Clinton revealed what he knew about Obama's ineligibility for office.
    While "posing" as our President and under the guise of "Commander in Chief", he has sent our troops to die. Since he is fraudulently holding office, this is murder. Those who placed him in in office (not the voters), his "handlers" and those in the DNC who knew that he was ineligible are complicit in his crimes.

    Both Bush presidencies set the stage for the final act in bring about the "New World Oder" that Obama was "selected" to usher in. He is a complete fraud, his whole life story is a fabrication. He IS the Manchurian Candidate and his "assignment" is to destroy this nation and establish a totalitarian stat and if he succeeds, America is "OVER"!

    Many have been "asleep" and that is largely due to an incredible and sustained effort by those in power, largely "behind the scene" through a vast array of control devices which undermine our ability to think and reason for ourselves (google: The Brookings Institute and The Tavistock Institute, Chemtrails, Vaccinations, Fluoridation, GMO, The Rothschild Dynasty, The Svali Documents, The Men Who Killed Kennedy, The Federal Reserve, Subliminal Advertising, the documentary: America: From Freedom to Fascism (Aaron Russo was killed because of this documentary) ). Discover the truth for yourselves. These searches will lead you to much much more. See the new movie "Runaway Slave". Stop believing the lies!

    The vast conspiracy YES I said CONSPIRACY is slowly but surely being exposed and more and more people are beginning to see what is going on. PLEASE open your eyes! WAKE UP. Look at the mountains of evidence that point to the "power behind the power" that is hell bent on ruling the world and making all of us their slaves.

    ReplyDelete
  44. When we consider all the mountain of evidence that obummer is not a natural born citizen , and that he allows the muslim brotherhood into our Homeland Security , F.B.I. , Dept . of ' Injustice ' and other sensitive areas , and that he he is hell bent on " fundamentally changing AMERICA to a socialist ( communist ) state ~ it is mind boggling that congress has allowed him to continue the destruction of our economy and our beliefs . Let us hope and pray that someone wakes up and brings indictment against the ineligible, fraudulent, treasonous lying imposter before his tern is up , and deny him the normal lifetime pension provided for a legitimate president . Arrest this bastard and march him off to prison ~ NOW .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They r ALL in it together...None are honest !! Placed against the wall and executed All, is the only way forward. Servants of and for the PEOPLE ! BAHhh!! WHAT A JOKE !!

      Delete
    2. I have found seven different aliases he has used

      Delete
  45. The notion of Obama’s mother, late in pregnancy, traveling alone (WND has shown that Obama senior was in Hawaii on August 4, 1961) from Hawaii where there are good hospitals, to Kenya, where there was Yellow Fever and bad hospitals, and doing so without any INS record of her leaving the USA or any record of her arriving in Kenya—---is absurd. And the fact that there is a birth certificate showing that she gave birth in Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu makes it even more absurd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, and a grand total of 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961.

      Delete
    2. That's false. Here's the truth: The Passport and Travel records for August 1961 to AND from Kenya are MISSING. Do your homework!

      Delete
    3. Since there were NO direct flights from Hawaii to Kenya or vice versa, the normal way to have gone in those days was via New York, and the files of the INS in New York are not missing, and no one has shown that Obama's mother or Obama were checked into the USA in 1961 or that his mother departed the USA in 1961.

      Just as importantly, the files of APPLICATIONS for visas or for changes to passports in Kenya are NOT missing. The files of Applications for documents in the Kenya consulate are still around, and if Obama had actually been born in Kenya, his mother would have had to have applied for either a US passport for him, or to have him added to her US passport, or a US visa on a foreign passport. Without one of them she could not have taken Obama from Kenya to the USA.

      Well, the files of applications still exist, and the Bush Administration had access to them for eight years up to January 2009, and if they had found any such document, they would have said. Are you alleging that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?

      The other facts also continue to apply, of course. There were only 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. And, a trip of that kind by Obama's mother late in pregnancy would have been extremely rare---especially with Obama's father staying in Hawaii, which WND has proved with a FOI Act request. And:


      (1) The Kenyan government investigated whether or not Obama was born there, and found that he was NOT born there.

      “Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

      “It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””

      http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged...

      (3) The government of Hawaii has said that there is a birth certificate that shows that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital. Officials of both political parties in Hawaii have stated this, and that includes the former Republican governor of Hawaii. That fact is further confirmed by the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and by the Index Data.

      (6) It is also useful to know that ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could sent those birth notices to the newspapers. That is because the section of the papers was called "Health Bureau Statistics"---so the notices had to come from the Health Bureau, the Department of Health. And in 1961 the DOH would only send out those notices for births IN Hawaii.

      Delete
  46. I Love it that Racists will go anywhere to Get a Fix....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. read your constitution article II section 1,, then for clarity read Vattels "Law of Nations" article 212.. The clause "natural born Citizen" was put in the constitution by George Washington, who owned three copies of "Law of Nations"

      Delete
    2. Yes I saw the video where Obama told a group of people that he was born in Kenya, Its funny that you believe everything else he says but not that.

      Delete
  47. according to our constitution Obama is not eligible for the office of president

    ReplyDelete
  48. Obama is an American citizen even if he was not born here. Why? Because both of his parents were high level CIA agents. The CIA has it's own rules which supercede the US constitution. If a CIA agent is working deep cover in a foriegn country and gives birth then the baby is automatically a US citizen. It is against the law to reveal the identity of a CIA agent that is why so many public figures claim to have seen his birth certificate rather then reveal the truth which is that Obama is CIA from a CIA family. Most people think his mom was a hippie who liked men of color. Actually his mom was in the third world doing banking...setting up buisness loans for for third world people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That fits w/ my comment below. See: Bari M. Shabazz....

      Delete
    2. Yes Obama is an american citizen. this is a great difference from a "natural born Citizen" as required in our constitution !!

      Delete
  49. Here is what I do not understand. My step dad adopted me when I was a little girl. My last name changed to his last name, and I was issued a new birth certificate bearing his name just as if he were present when I was born. Since then, I have never ever been allowed to request or receive a birth certificate with my original birth last name on it. That person no longer exists. So HOW did Obama, if he was later adopted by Soetero, get his Obama birth name birth certificate anyway? I don't believe for one minute that he was born in Hawaii, or that he's even who he claims he is. I also know many people know the truth and have aided him in keeping his secrets safe, as well as the millions he's paid to hide his entire life! I have a stinking suspicion regarding this name: Bari M. Shabazz. Google it. I hope the truth is finally proven some day, because so many of us have just instinctively known the truth all along.... Obama isn't a natural born citizen. And he's a douche bag.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Wow what a nice bargains deals you have available i am really so inspired here keep continue sharing.
    Thanks



    Best Deals Site

    ReplyDelete
  51. Dan, Barack Obama is a very famous personality, so most of citizens try to find information like their birth records, marriage records and other vital records. Thanks for sharing other imperative information of vital records.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Dear Sir,

    Thank you. Your work is not only brilliantly and clearly done, it is also 100% accurate to the best of my knowledge. I have my Hawaiian long and short forms. I know what you speak of is correct from my own research. If you wish to contact me, I may be able to get you in touch with a few in the position to make use of your information.

    With Sincere gratitude,

    ~D

    ReplyDelete
  53. A group of people who have not given their names CLAIMED to have gone into the British national files and found what they said. Moreover, the same group who do not give their names quotes unnamed sources. ALSO the group that claims to have accessed the file made a foolish mistake. That is because they claimed to have looked into the files of The British Protectorate of East Africa, but that name had been changed in 1920. In 1961 there was no British Protectorate of east Africa. It was called "The Kenya Colony." So the claim that the group actually looked at the files is highly suspect.


    (1) The Kenyan government investigated whether or not Obama was born there, and found that he was NOT born there.

    “Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

    “It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””

    http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged...

    (2) A grand total of 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961, so the idea that Obama and his mother were two of them is pretty far-fetched.

    (3) WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior was in Hawaii throughout 1961, so the notion that Obama's mother traveled to Kenya, a country with Yellow Fever, at enormous expense and risk of stillbirth ALONE is also extremely far-fetched.

    (4) There is no documentary proof that Obama was born in any other country than the USA, and there would have to be proof if indeed it were true.

    That is because a child born outside of the USA requires either a US visa on a foreign passport or to be entered on the mother’s US passport to get to the USA. Those documents or the applications for them would still exist and would have been found easily IF Obama was born outside of the USA. But no such document has been found. Yes, of course, a child could be smuggled across either the Mexican or Canadian border, but that does not apply to Hawaii (which does not have a land border with a foreign country) and it certainly does not apply to the allegation of birth in Kenya.

    (5) The government of Hawaii has said that there is a birth certificate that shows that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital. Officials of both political parties in Hawaii have stated this, and that includes the former Republican governor of Hawaii. That fact is further confirmed by the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 and by the Index Data.

    (6) It is also useful to know that ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could sent those birth notices to the newspapers. That is because the section of the papers was called "Health Bureau Statistics"---so the notices had to come from the Health Bureau, the Department of Health. And in 1961 the DOH would only send out those notices for births IN Hawaii.

    ReplyDelete
  54. A couple of things about this article -

    1. Isn't it amazing that after almost four years we are still debating whether Obama was or was not born in the United States? I highly doubt that there has ever been such questions regarding the legitimacy of any other candidate for President of the United States or for an actual President in the history of America. The very fact that the questions persist deserve, at least, to be fully investigated by a impartial party (finding that impartial individual would be difficult, but I'm sure it could be done). This isn't, after all, some piddly little position we're talking about - this is the Presidency of the United States of America and we should have been able to easily determine whether or not Obama was eligible to be POTUS.

    2. I have always questioned just why Obama has fought so hard and so long to keep his birth certificate from the public. WHY WOULD HE DO THAT?? If the birth certificate would have definitively answered the questions regarding his eligibility, why hide it? Why fight sharing it with the public?? Why spend so much money to keep it from the public?? Why wouldn't he have produced it immediately when initially questioned and said, "here it is folks - I'm eligible so stop the questions"??

    3. It's also "funny" (i.e. coincidental) how his birth occurred in a state that apparently has some "outs" for birth certificates or at least confusion regarding the legitimacy of a birth certificate. By that I mean that the state I was born in provides an actual paper birth certificate to the parents and maintains one on file. On the birth certificate is all the usual info - date of birth, place (including hospital, parents names, etc. as well as my tiny little footprints stamped in ink). I wonder whether there was/is any other state/territory in the U.S. that would have allowed him to be able to make a fraudulent birth certificate and pass it off as legit? Or was Hawaii the logical place because of the apparent confusion?

    4. NO ONE - absolutely NO ONE should be allowed to run for President of the United States UNTIL they have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are a legal and legitimate citizen of the United States and meet the eligibility requirements to run for president. This is something that should be done PRIOR to the candidate running for office. Again, this isn't a piddly little position, but the most powerful position in the world - requiring proof prior to running seems a very reasonable requirement.

    The thing that still gets me the most about all of this is that he didn't immediately provide the birth certificate - I always come back to that. A man with nothing to hide would have got it out there immediately to stop the rumors. Perhaps a man with something to hide would take his time and/or attempt to keep it hidden at all costs.

    Is Obama legit?? Apparently only he knows the truth and he'll never tell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You forgot that the Hawaii birth certificate shows no foot print.. and the Kenya birth certificate shows a foot print

      Delete
  55. Obama really was born in Hawaii. The fact that some people are nutty and believe that he could have been born somewhere else does not change that situation. There are and always will be nutty people, such as the ones who believe that George Bush lead the 911 plot or that the bodies of space aliens are stored in Rosewell, NM.

    Hawaii is thousands of miles away from any foreign country, and it was rare for women to travel long distances in 1961, and there is a birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii, and its existence and the facts on it have been confirmed by the the officials of BOTH parties, and further confirmed by the Index Data file, and still further confirmed by the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii (and only by the DOH of Hawaii) in 1961. There is even a witness who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about "Stanley had a baby"---and yet there are nuts who continue to believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country.

    Re: "1. Isn't it amazing that after almost four years we are still debating whether Obama was or was not born in the United States? "

    Answer. No it is not amazing at all. First, that is how WND and the lawyers Berg and Orly Taitz etc. make their money. (2) There are people who hate Obama and some are willing to lie to hurt him. These two things are not amazing at all.

    Re: "2. I have always questioned just why Obama has fought so hard and so long to keep his birth certificate from the public. WHY WOULD HE DO THAT?? "

    Answer. He didn't. He released the official birth certificate of Hawaii, known as the certification of live birth, way back in June of 2008. It was birthers who claimed that this was insufficient (but it wasn't) or that it is not a real birth certificate (it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii issues normally, barring a special request) or that it was forged (it wasn't).

    Re: "3. It's also "funny" (i.e. coincidental) how his birth occurred in a state that apparently has some "outs" for birth certificates or at least confusion regarding the legitimacy of a birth certificate."

    Only birthers have claimed that, and they have no proof whatever.

    Re: "
    4. NO ONE - absolutely NO ONE should be allowed to run for President of the United States UNTIL they have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are a legal and legitimate citizen of the United States and meet the eligibility requirements to run for president.."

    I agree. Why aren't you demanding more proof from Mitt Romney that he was born in Michigan? He has shown only a PDF image of a photostatic copy of a short-form birth certificate, without the name of the hospital or the name of the doctor, and it does not even show the raised seal.

    Re: "The thing that still gets me the most about all of this is that he didn't immediately provide the birth certificate."

    Once again. He did, back in June 2008.

    Re: "Is Obama legit??"

    Once again, it is nutty to believe that a state birth certificate confirmed by the officials of both parties, confirmed by the Index Data, confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers, confirmed by the witness who wrote home, in a state thousands of miles from a foreign country (and with no evidence that his mother traveled or even had a passport, and with the government of Kenya saying for sure that he was not born there---based in its investigation) could all be wrong and Obama was born in a foreign country.

    Come to think of it, it is vastly more likely that Mitt Romney, whose listed birth place was only a mile or so from a foreign country, and whose parents at the time had a lot more money to travel than Obama's parents, and who has not provided anywhere near the proof that Obama did, was born in a foreign country.

    A question for you. Why is it that Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review all call birthers CRAZY?




    ReplyDelete
  56. British Citizenship - Global Migrate

    British Citizenship by descent' is the category for the children born outside the UK to a British citizen. Rules for acquiring British citizenship by descent depend on when the person was born.
    Keywords:-
    British Citizenship
    Contact Us:-
    Head Office (pre booked appointments only)
    International House,
    39 Great Windmill Street,
    Piccadilly,
    London
    W1D 7LX
    Tel: +44 (0)207 993 4762
    Fax: +44 (0)207 691 7969
    Email: headoffice@global-migrate.com

    http://global-migrate.com/british-citizenship.html

    ReplyDelete
  57. Re: "British Citizenship by descent' is the category for the children born outside the UK to a British citizen."

    What are you trying to say? That although Obama was born in Hawaii, as he was, he was a dual citizen of Britain and the USA at birth? That is true and he has stated it in his book.

    But if you are thinking that dual citizenship at birth has any effect on Natural Born Citizen status, you are wrong. We have already had at least four presidents before Obama who were dual citizens either at birth or while they actually were president including Woodrow Wilson (at birth, British/USA). More importantly, the definition of Natural Born simply has no reference to dual citizenship whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And dual citizenship at birth makes him not eligible for presidency.. lets not quible about mistakes in the past lets make sure we don't do them again

      Delete
  58. Re: "And dual citizenship at birth makes him not eligible for presidency..."

    Who says? Certainly not the chief justice of the USA, who swore in Obama, twice. Certainly not the US Electoral College, who gave Obama every single electoral vote that he won in the general election despite a letter writing campaign by birthers to encourage some of the members of the US Electoral College to change their votes. Certainly not the US Congress, which confirmed Obama's election UNANIMOUSLY.

    Certainly not Edwin Meese, who does not mention dual citizenship in his definition of Natural Born Citizen. Certainly not the US Supreme Court, which did not mention dual citizenship in the Wong Kim Ark case, which defined Natural Born Citizen as coming from the common law and referring to the place of birth and does not mention dual citizenship. Certainly not the current US Supreme Court, which has just turned down a birther appeal of the court ruling in Georgia that held that every child born in the USA is a Natural Born Citizen and made no mention of dual citizenship. Oh, and what is the effect of the US Supreme Court rejecting an appeal of a lower court ruling? Answer, the effect is that the lower court ruling stands; it is the law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: "And dual citizenship at birth makes him not eligible for presidency..."

      Who says?
      ****************

      I know! I know! The U.S. Constitution and these 16 words "or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution". It's a grandfather clause in the Constitution. Look it up...there's a reason it's there. Or you could just go to this link and read it.

      http://www.colony14.net/id634.html

      It's not theory, conspiracy or other, it's just carved-in-stone history. Our founding fathers KNEW what they were up against and they KNEW what they had to do.

      Delete
  59. Thanks for the post event staffing agency You should take part in a contest for one of the best blogs on the web. I will recommend this site!

    ReplyDelete
  60. After considering all this & his re-election, is there any wonder why ALL 50 states have petitioned to secede? We're not all crazy, we just hate constitutional usurpers!

    ReplyDelete
  61. Obama caused this controversy himself. Conservatives or Republicans did not cause it. The incredible amount of secrecy over his college records, his birth records, his past, his history, the millions of dollars he has spent to keep them all secret is the problem. Better that he had paid those millions to someone else's Presidential campaign that he liked. This controversy over his legitimacy to be the President of the United States of America will never go away. 100 years from now, people will still be asking the questions.
    He brought it upon himself, and as in most investigations, people don't hide the Truth unless they have something to hide.

    ReplyDelete
  62. The people not reading your blogs are missing out a lot of quality contents.
    auto imports

    ReplyDelete
  63. These articles and blogs are truly enough for me for a day.
    auto imports

    ReplyDelete
  64. These articles and blogs are truly enough for me for a day.

    auto imports

    ReplyDelete
  65. What I don't understand is, why? Why would they choose a candidate for the presidency who wasn't born in the country? It just doesn't make sense to me. It is not like Obama was the ONLY person who could have possibly been the candidate. It is not like they HAD to use Obama, so they had to lie to get him in. I really don't think there is some shortage of viable politicians, that they would be forced to use Obama fully knowing that he is ineligible. It wasn't like he was well known or popular with the common citizen before he was nominated. Basically, he was presented to the country as a nominee, they could have presented ANYONE! That is why this whole "birther" thing doesn't make sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Interesting information, thank you for sharing. I would be curious to look at my state's Ohio public records. I think it's good that we have the right to look at these kind of records, since they can clearly uncover some interesting information.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Show the Microfilm of the document of birth as recorded, to truly back up and support your story. Why take us half way there?

    ReplyDelete
  68. The request by Clinton as Sec. of State of the USA to British Archives to make this information unavailable is traitorous. One comment about John Kennedy being assassinated is another clue to Democrat corruption. When John made his brother Bobby Attorney General, Bobby announced that they were going after Corruption in Government, meaning they were going against the Democratic Party Leadership. That is the real reason they were murdered. Now we have the most corrupt criminal gang the world has ever seen, the Democrat Party. For power and to enslave the American people they have worked for years to infiltrate election commissions across our nation with pawns willing to do criminal acts thinking they are adressing old wrongs by subverting the vote. These people have cut their own throats by crushing democracy for criminality.

    ReplyDelete
  69. this woman claims she forged Baracks BC...
    *takes a deep breath because she knows she's wasting her time once again* Obama is the son of white THOMAS BEAUCHAMP OWENS, SR. formerly of Clewiston, Florida. His grandmother was a black maid for the Owens household when Owens impregnated her daughter. The two families were kept separated until he was age 14 when they met for the first time at a Hawaiian pinata birthday party given by the (Popeye) Delgado family who had ties to the Hendry County Drug Lord Pablo Escobar a man who was not as ruthless and cruel as many say. The woman who took Allen? under her wing at this age was a Keller who left her nearly full-grown sons, Charles and Hank, in the care of Gladys Maxwell Owens (Clewiston, FL)formerly of Tucson, AZ. At age 24 the two families came back in contact with each other which is when "Obama" was given HI birth cert info passed on though a Palm Beach Community College Bus. Law professor by the name of David Nixon to a Journalism student and Allen's half-sister Nancy R. Owens, aka Pablo's White Rabbit. Gladys Owens was set to fill out the student paperwork when a white male Chicago lawyer?/judge? wanted his own personal hit-man from the Medellin cartel which had gained quite the reputation. This judge may now be residing on the Supreme Court for all I know give that the meeting with this individual was very brief. To uncover the truth means the both the following cases and the US government would come under scrutiny: Jimmy Hoffa ('81), John F Kennedy, Jr '81 (killed two weeks apart with CIA knowledge and involuntary involvement leading to eventual murder attempts), Adam Walsh '81 , the shooting of Pres. Ronald Reagan '81 which was NOT a deranged lunatic love story, killing of FBI, CIA, and committing other terrorists attacks which the non-military Reagan CHOSE TO IGNORE. Not to mention disclosing and explaining why Escobar was allowed to build a miniature town complete with a PRISON to house captured Americans ON AMERICAN SOIL IN SOUTH FLORIDA and why a journalist was almost killed. It would be EASY TO PROVE WITH LITTLE MORE THAN A BLOOD TEST. The Virginia Vallejo/journalist romance was, in the beginning, also a cover-up. The Republicans will more than likely NEVER take down their false (NON-MILTARY) God, Reagan.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-jckhv4vqqk

    ReplyDelete
  70. http://specialoperationsspeaks.com/articles/open-letter-to-the-us-house-of-representatives2

    ReplyDelete
  71. Thank You For providing Information about UK And Immigration Visa. i have some Information for those person who want go Australia for Work and British Citizenship. for More information Visit

    http://global-migrate.com/british-citizenship.html

    ReplyDelete
  72. The paper trail back to Obama's birth is very sketchy and incomplete. He may have been a CIA mule. That is why The Supreme Court will not indict him. Did you know that Obama was the only President, after taking the oath of office on 01/20/08 WHO met with all the supreme court justices in a private meeting, absent Justice Thomas, right after he took the oath? Since that meeting he has been untouchable. Mit Romney never raised the issue in the campaign because his natural citizenship is questionable. In primaries past, a fake birth certificate, by any one of the candidates, would have been fodder for the media. Remember Gary Hart? A man with no history, a fake ID, and fake social security number, no childhood friends or pictures, may be a clone. When is the last time you read an update in the national media about "dolly?" Obama has broken every campaign promise. He has ruled by executive decree and has nullified Congress. No charges will be filed against the President because the net cast for him would reel in too many of the bosses, and result in the seizure of all the gold property, black programs and capital that a RICO investigation would uncover. We need the men who operate the courts to file multiple indictments against the President's treasons, at the same time, in multiple courts. All co-conspirators should be arrested, accounts seized, and disclosure made.

    THERE NEEDS TO BE A MILLION MAN MARCH ON WASHINGTON ON THE 4th of JULY 2013 IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSTITUTION. 6/8/2013

    ReplyDelete
  73. By the time they prove he is not a natural citizen it will be too late. His term will be up and the damage will be done. His master plan to destroy the USA from the inside out will be complete. We are looking all over the world for terrorist that want to destroy the USA but it seems the biggest threat is hiding in plain sight in the White House.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Kilimanjaro mount is great place to visit,when you say Kilimanjaro It raises adventure, legendary and amazing images to mind, but to find out what it's really like why not purchase a few Cheap Kilimanjaro Ticket for you and your loved ones and see for yourself!

    ReplyDelete
  75. I watched a video of Obama giving a speech and he stated that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii.I find it odd that the liberals believe everything else Obama says but not believe him telling where he was born.

    ReplyDelete
  76. The biggest cover-up in US History is this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT6eodnYZGg

    I think Barack Obama was born in Kenya, which was ruled by Britain at the time of his birth.

    ReplyDelete